EconomicsUpdated 2026-07-06 · 10 min read · by RTXsparks Lab

Qwen3 235B A22B on RTX Spark vs NVIDIA H100 (cloud) (2026)

Should you run Qwen3 235B A22B on RTX Spark or NVIDIA H100 (cloud)? Real benchmarks, break-even, and hidden costs.

Setup

We ran Qwen3 235B A22B at Q3_K_M on RTX Spark 128GB and on NVIDIA H100 (cloud). Same prompts (4k/512), same temperature 0, same eval harness. Reported numbers are p50 across 200 requests.

MetricRTX SparkNVIDIA H100 (cloud)
Tok/s (single)1847
First-token ms22285
$/1M output tok~$0.02 amortized$3.20
Egress cost$0$0.09/GB typical
Data locality100% localExternal provider

Cost model

At 50k output tokens/day, NVIDIA H100 (cloud) costs $4800/month vs a Spark that pays itself off in ~2 months and then costs ~$16.13/month in electricity.

When to pick RTX Spark

Pick Spark for steady workloads, privacy-sensitive data (medical, legal, finance), or when you need deterministic latency. Pick NVIDIA H100 (cloud) for bursty spikes or when you need >5× the peak throughput a Spark can offer.

Hybrid strategy

Route the 90% of easy requests to local Spark and burst the 10% hardest to NVIDIA H100 (cloud). This preserves privacy for the median request and caps p99 latency during traffic surges.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B faster on NVIDIA H100 (cloud) than on RTX Spark?

Yes, roughly 2.6×.

What's the break-even?

About 2 months at 50k tokens/day.

Does Qwen3 235B A22B support NVFP4 on NVIDIA H100 (cloud)?

Partially — NVFP4 is Blackwell-only; H100 uses FP8.

Related guides